In an era when space is a contested frontier — crowded with satellites, ambition and geopolitics — Taiwan’s pursuit of a cosmic presence is a story less about conquest and more about survival. Unlike the flashy triumphs of the US or China’s militarized orbit, Taiwan’s journey is a quiet rebellion, blending industrial savvy with a defiance of its diplomatic exile.
As of last month, the Taiwan Space Agency (TASA) was charging ahead with a NT$25 billion (US$764.41 million) plan to launch four low Earth orbit satellites by 2029 — a “Taiwan Starlink” that is already sparking chatter on X.
That is not just about fast Internet; it is a lifeline for a democracy under pressure, a way to secure communications in a neighborhood where China’s shadow looms large.
China’s space machine, fueled by more than US$11 billion annually, churns out stations, lunar probes and anti-satellite weapons — tools of dominance that could zero in on Taiwan’s fledgling assets during any flare-up. Locked out of UN space talks at Beijing’s insistence, Taiwan cannot negotiate orbital slots or lunar rules, leaving it sidelined in a game it is forced to play anyway.
Yet, TASA is betting big: Those satellites promise optical links — faster and safer than radio waves — and 6G integration, thrusting Taiwan into the future of space tech.
It is a hedge against coercion, a way to say: “We’re here,” in a domain China wants to own. That is not just science — it is sovereignty, a middle finger to exclusion dressed up as innovation.
Taiwan’s edge lies in its tech DNA. Semiconductors, optics and materials — it is the unsung hero of the satellite supply chain, ready to churn out tiny, tough components for a miniaturized space race. The “Taiwan Starlink” could turn that into a global calling card, a democratic foil to China’s top-down control, maybe even become a lunar supplier for solar panels or artificial intelligence navigation.
However, the catch is brutal: no launch pads. Last year’s “Mountain Sparrow-T1A” flop, on Japan’s KAIROS rocket, was not sabotage, but it screamed vulnerability — Taiwan’s dreams ride on someone else’s wings, and politics can clip them fast. China’s sway over allies and norms only tightens the noose, freezing Taiwan out of lunar talks just as the moon becomes the next economic frontier.
Space sustainability is where Taiwan could flip the script, and it is worth digging into. With 36,000-plus debris chunks clogging orbits, the stakes are high — collisions trash billion-dollar assets and no one is cleaning up fast enough. Taiwan is already nodding at this with deorbit tech, but it could go further: active debris removal, such as nets or lasers, or lifecycle rules that force satellites to burn up responsibly.
TASA’s small scale is an asset here — nimble enough to test ideas big players would not touch, credible enough to pitch them to allies. The original piece hinted that was soft power, and it is spot-on: in a cosmos choking on junk, Taiwan could lead a cleanup, earning a seat at the table it has been denied. That is not just green — it is strategic, a way to shape rules without a UN badge.
The future is a tightrope. Nail 2029 and Taiwan gets a secure grid, a tech halo and maybe a lunar foothold — proof it can thrive despite the squeeze. Botch it, and China’s got an opening to pounce.
Partnerships — with Japan’s launch savvy, US tech or scrappy Baltic deals — could weave Taiwan into the supply chain, while sustainability chops amplify its voice. The original saw this as resilience meeting opportunity, and it is dead right: Taiwan is not just playing catch-up — it is crafting a space identity that is agile, principled and damn useful. In a sky full of noise, its quiet grit might just echo loudest.
Jack Huang is a research fellow of the UN based in Taipei.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS